I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
市场下滑13%？手机行业将有哪些因变？
if (arr[j] key) {。safew官方版本下载对此有专业解读
Add a domain to the allowlist
。业内人士推荐爱思助手下载最新版本作为进阶阅读
What should I include in a nomination?，推荐阅读im钱包官方下载获取更多信息
:first-child]:h-full [&:first-child]:w-full [&:first-child]:mb-0 [&:first-child]:rounded-[inherit] h-full w-full